Thursday, March 20, 2014

America's Lost Innocence

   In today's society, the public has very little trust in the government, and every personal move made by politicians is available for everyone in the country to see and judge.  Whether it be Barack Obama partying in college or Michael Grimm exploding on a reporter (http://foxnewsinsider.com/2014/01/29/video-gop-lawmaker-michael-grimm-curses-threatens-reporter-after-state-union for those of you who don't know what I'm referencing), everything that politicians do or have done in their past are brutally exploited by the public.  However, America has not always been this way.  The Watergate Scandal of Nixon's presidency and the Pentagon Papers from the Vietnam war led the American public to watch their government much more closely.  The Pentagon Papers were the history of the United States involvement in the war in Vietnam, and showed how the American military had been doing during the war.  When these papers were released to the public in 1971, the public was shocked when it learned that the Johnson administration had lied to the American public about the condition of the war.  The Johnson administration led the public to believe the war was going well for the US when in fact it was not, and the administration withheld information from the public about the expansion of the war into Cambodia.  When President Nixon was in office, a group of men broke into the Democratic National Committee Headquarters.  This incident was at first not a large deal, because no immediate connection was made to the White House, and President Nixon denied any connection to the break in.  But as evidence poured out, the public began to be very suspicious of Nixon's involvement.  Although Nixon was never proven to have participated in the Watergate break in, the public suspicion about the president refusing to hand over White House recordings and other suspicious activities committed by the president, he finally became overwhelmed and resigned from office.   These actions by the Johnson administration led the public to view the White House and the American government in general with a closer eye.

3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice post, Patrick. In addition to the specific actions you mentioned that the Johnson Administration took part in, I think in general the advent of new technology has lead to increased scrutiny of government actions. For example, in the past few months numerous American citizens have been critical of the NSA, the National Security Agency, for their domestic surveillance. Some citizens believe that the actions undertaken by the NSA infringe on their right to privacy. Thus, some of these citizens have very little faith in the government and feel that the government is infringing on their personal rights. New surveillance technology allows the NSA to accomplish what they do, domestic surveillance like this would simply not have been possible in the 1800s because of a lack of technology. Now ultimately, the Johnson administration marked the beginning of a distrust in government because in cases like the NSA, new technology gives the government more power over their citizens.

    ReplyDelete
  3. While we're on the subject of the public more closely scrutinizing the president and how technology has lead to increased scrutiny of government actions in general, let's take a moment to consider the flip side of this matter: the measures that the government has taken to investigate the lives of the people. In order to discuss this matter, I will reference the Patriot Act which was passed in 2001 following the september 11 attacks in an effort to raise national security. It violates some of the basic rights guaranteed to Americans.

    "FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: Government may monitor religious and political institutions without suspecting criminal activity to assist terror investigation.

    * FREEDOM OF INFORMATION: Government has closed once-public immigration hearings, has secretly detained hundreds of people without charges, and has encouraged bureaucrats to resist public records requests.

    * FREEDOM OF SPEECH: Government may prosecute librarians or keepers of any other records if they tell anyone that the government subpoenaed information related to a terror investigation.

    * RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION: Government may monitor federal prison jailhouse conversations between attorneys and clients, and deny lawyers to Americans accused of crimes.

    * FREEDOM FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES: Government may search and seize Americans' papers and effects without probable cause to assist terror investigation.

    * RIGHT TO A SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL: Government may jail Americans indefinitely without a trial.

    * RIGHT TO LIBERTY: Americans may be jailed without being charged or being able to confront witnesses against them.
    Copyright © 2002, The Associated Press"

    In parting, I leave you with a quote by Ben Franklin: "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."

    Source: http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=885226

    ReplyDelete