Monday, August 26, 2013

Are we losing our Right to Freedom of Speech?



During the past few days we have been discussing a significant point of our nations history in preparation for the AP exam in May. It is important to understand that a group of Colonies that were placed on the new found continental landmass known as North America fought for their freedom and became their own independent nation. Yet, more important then what happened is why it happened. Many attribute the cause of the Revolutionary War to the overbearing power of Great Britain which was using its authority to control many different colonies all over their global empire. Through many different acts, such as the Proclamation act of 1763 (which disallowed settlers to move past the Appalachians), and taxes on goods such as sugar and tea the English parliament forced their authority on the American colonies. Though these acts had consequences many believe that it was more of the principle that angered a majority of the colonist. The idea that a Parliamentary body in England was making the decisions for the colonies without actually being their angered the colonist. They wanted the unalienable rights that they would have received as British citizens. This is why they went to war. Once they gained their independence they no longer had to worry about their freedom being in jeopardy. Things were done legally and through a republican system that actually presided on the continent. People were given their rights as American citizen to many things such as freedom of speech. Until now.

In May 2013, media reports were released that revealed operational details of National Surveillance Agency and its mass surveillance of foreign nations and US citizens. This informations was uncovered by Edward Snowden who was a member of the CIA he released this information to Wikileaks to show the world the truth about the American government and then fled the country. This quickly exploded into one of the most important discoveries in recent history. Many agree that it was the most significant leak in US history. The idea of mass surveillance is that the entire population is being pervasively watched by the government. Anything you say or do can affect you. Though the government argues this is only for the protection of the American citizens against terrorist and other dangerous external forces, it is still morally wrong. Many have criticized mass surveillance as being a violation of privacy rights. It is also criticized for being illegal and for denying social and political freedoms. With these rights being constantly denied some fear that American will ultimately become a totalitarian state in which freedom of speech is not allowed and political opposition is instantly crushed. by releasing this information Snowden has allowed countless people to learn the truth about America's political system and how it is not the Perfect republic that everyone that it was. For this many consider him a hero and a patriot for deciphering information which would in every other way be hidden from us. He is also been called a traitor and a whistleblower because he went against his country and has thoroughly weakened our intelligence capabilities.

The idea of mass surveillance denies Americans a right that was clearly stated in the Constitution the founding document of our nation the right to free speech. No matter what you wish to say and who you support politically or in other matters you have the right to express your opinion. During the colonial days many American's who spoke out willingly against parliament were injured or killed. From this it became an important initiative of the rebel forces to fight for this right during the revolution.Yet in this day and age more things intimidate us more than British soldiers. The ongoing War on Terror has made a distinct mark on America. After the 9/11 attacks different intelligence programs have done all in their power to apprehend the perpetrators and to prevent another attack from happening. So in reality they use mass surveillance as a method of keeping American citizens protected. This brings up the question that I wish to propose. Should the United States use Mass surveillance? If so why? Is this something that our founding fathers would have thought our nation which was founded on rights of freedoms and individual rights would accept?

Written by
Ryan Adibi

5 comments:

  1. While I do not approve of the NSA's actions, I do believe that there is justification for their actions. As Thomas Hobbes emphasized in his Leviathon, everyone must give up a little bit of their freedom in return for additional security. Thomas Paine, in Common Sense, adds to this idea by insisting that individuals in a republic need to sacrifice their personal self interest to the public good (AP pg 147).

    Connecting back to the modern issue, NSA chief Gen. Keith Alexander claimed that the mass surveillance system has prevented 50 potential terrorist events since 9/11. Now obviously there is a lot of bias in this stat, but assuming it is true, I believe that there is reasonable justification for the NSA to continue with their mass surveillance projects. While we individual citizens do lose some privacy rights, the overall American public benefits from added security, just as Hobbes and Paine envisioned.


    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. While these recent revelations are concerning, what we do not know is even more troubling. If the US government has knowingly ignored from the laws stated in the constitution regarding the freedom of speech, then it is quite possible and highly plausible that other laws have treated with the same neglect. The real question is what other rights has our government impeded on? How has the great nation become so ignorant to the manipulation of its fundamental laws? Yes, our security is vital, but at what point did we have to sacrifice our individual freedoms for it? I contest that the NSA surveillance is a gross violation of the foundation to which the founding fathers constructed this great country. When did this country yield its rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for a government intent on monitoring its citizens' every Facebook post? Heck, I might even be put on a list for this comment, who knows.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Nick Ambiel
    I do agree with your points, Nick, but maybe, like the British were at times, the US government believes that they are doing it to protect the American people. From our point of view it is a huge over step on their part into our personal lives that we don't expect from a national government. However, the government could see it as a safety precaution in case there was, let's say, someone posting something about planting a bomb in a certain area. This is loosely related to the fact that some of the taxes placed on the colonists were for their own protection, but they saw it as an encroachment on their liberty and freedom that the British government imposed taxes without their own representation in Parliament. I'm just saying their are multiple perspectives that are in play and that the government probably has multiple agendas at work in the surveillance of the American people even if it does violate our rights in some ways.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is a very interesting discussion on freedom of speech. When considering Snowden's actions, one thing that is important to remember is not only the information that he revealed, but also what he did after. Regardless of whether or not you think what he did was right, we should remember that rather than face the consequences of his actions, he decided to flee the country. In our society, peaceful protest is an often-used way to voice opinions; however, by fleeing after his kind of "peaceful protest," Snowden has changed the name of the game. While his reasons for fleeing are understandable, if he thought releasing the information was the right thing to do and that it was protected under the first amendment, maybe he should have stayed in the US and peacefully defended his position.

    ReplyDelete