With
the massive economic downturn of the Great Depression, many Americans looked
inward as they attempted to solve their own problems. The general feeling among Americans was that
we have our own problems. Why should we
pay any attention to problems looming anywhere outside our borders? Hence, isolationism thrives.
The
London Economic Conference of 1933,
which consisted of sixty-six nations, looked to solve the economic crash on a
global scale. When the countries
demanded the US maintain a stronger grip on the value of the dollar, Roosevelt
made the brash to decision to not comply.
He didn’t want to sacrifice his own powers in dealing with the
depression at home, for the sake of the global depression. Though, this backfired, as Roosevelt found
that this individualistic attitude plunged the entire world even deeper into
depression.
Isolationist attitude extended to
Asia when Congress passed the Tydings-Mcduffie
Act (1934). This act would give independence to the
Philippines by 1946. In the mean time, there would be a slow process releasing
the United States influence on the islands.
Within out own landmass (North and
South America), America essentially became more isolationist. At the Seventh Pan-American Conference of
1933, the United States promoted non-intervention with the Latin American
sovereign countries. The idea was if we
stopped intervening in Latin American affairs, we could create strong partners
with some of the Latin American countries.
Cuba was released from the Platt Amendment, which had essentially said
we had the power to intervene in their government if we ever felt they were a
threat. The Good Neighbor policy formally
promoted United states nonintervention in Latin America. It proved extremely successful as we
strengthened ties with Latin America, and, for the first time, Latin Americans
truly began to respect the United States.
Though, this isolationist attitude
was not seen in everything the United States did. There are also strong exceptions. In 1933, the United States formally
recognized the Soviet Union, despite our history of strong anti-communist
sentiment. Roosevelt was influenced to
do this in hopes that Soviet Russia could be a strong trade partner and a
friendly ally if there were ever to be, say, a war against Germany or Japan.
Ironically, during this period of
isolationism, tariffs were actually decreased.
The Reciprocal Trade Agreements
Act of 1934, designed to increase global trade, lowered the outrageously
high Hawley-Smoot tariffs. It also
provided more power for the government to quickly adjust tariffs, without the
approval of the Senate. Overall, the
Reciprocal Trade Agreements were quite successful in increasing foreign trade
and improving relations all over the world, especially in Latin America. As the United States lowered its tariff
firewalls, other countries began to also.
This was a big step toward taking the world of the depression. Congress, despite reducing tariffs, felt
little sympathy for foreign debtors. The
Johnson Debt Default Act (1934)
prevented other nations already in debt from borrowing any more money.
As Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy
teamed up in the Rome-Berlin Axis,
the United States remained its calm, feeling the vast Atlantic provided some
sort of protection. (Whether it actually
did, it debatable.)
I hope this provides a good overview
of the Great Depression/pre-war isolationism in the United States in the early
1930’s. Here is a question to
ponder: Was the United States isolationism
justified, or did only bring ruin to an economically depressed world preparing to
enter into another world war?
In my opinion, America's isolationism after WWI was not justified, but it is understandable. It makes sense that the massive losses dealt by WWI would scare Americans away from any dealings with foreign nations, explaining acts like the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. However, in thinking only of itself, America sank the whole world into a depression. High tariffs springing up in every country hurt world trade and worsened the effects of economic recession. As you mention, this individualistic attitude helped no one, and thus cannot be justified.
ReplyDelete