Why Imperialize?
For the
money! Farmers and factory owners began
looking outward for the foreign markets.
With increased productivity and labor (immigrants and natural population
increase), it made perfect sense. The
United States pushed an idea called the Big
Sister policy, which was an attempt to get Latin American countries to buy
from Northern traders.
Venezuela – From 1895-1896 gold was found in this
country. Venezuela had long disputed its
boundary with British Guiana, and with gold, these tensions were brought even
higher. America joined in, invoking the
Monroe Doctrine, and Britain backed off.
The compromise between Britain and America was coined the Great Rapprochement.
Hawaii – When the McKinley
Tariff (1890) raised taxes on Hawaiian sugar imports, many Americans
(especially white planters), got mad.
They demanded annexation. That
was joined with desires for the Hawaiian Islands to be a naval defense base. Though, due to resistance from Queen
Liliuokalani and then eventual heightening of military fears, Hawaii wasn’t
annexed until 1898.
Cuba – The people of Cuba began to revolt against the
Spanish empire in 1895, partly due to oppression, and partly due to economic
issues spurring from American tariffs.
Spain attempted to crush the revolt.
The United States sent the battleship Maine over to Cuba to protect and evacuate Americans, claiming it
was just for a “friendly visit.” The
ship mysteriously exploded, which was actually due to mechanical issues, yet
Americans insisted it was an attack from Spain.
President McKinley, stuck in between the desire to stifle Spain’s
possession of Cuba, yet, for a fear of retaliation, he eventually compromised with
the Teller Amendment. This amendment stated that when the US
overthrew Spain’s rule in Cuba they would give Cubans their freedom.
The US put
together an army coined “Rough Riders”
due to the fact that many were cowboys, ex-convicts, etc. The US overthrew Spanish rule in August
1898. By 1902 the US withdrew from Cuba,
yet the US did not seem to follow the Teller Amendment to well. The US came up with the Platt Amendment, with forbade Cubans to sign treaties that would
put their independence at stake and take on debt beyond what they can handle,
or else the US could intervene.
Puerto Rico – Spain was forced to give this area up after
the war over Cuba. It became a territory
in the United States. The Foraker Act (1900) granted the Puerto
Ricans a limited democratic government.
In the famed Insular Cases
the Supreme Court said that Puerto Ricans did not enjoy all the same rights as
Americans, despite being subject to American rule.
Philippines – This area really stumped McKinley. He didn’t want to leave it to the Spanish and
he didn’t want to let it be free, fearing it would fall into anarchy. Not only that, but Wall Street was yelling
opportunities for money and Protestants were yelling opportunities for
converts. America decided to buy the
islands. The Anti-Imperialist League argued this would never turn a profit, and
that such a despotic government in the American owned Philippines could bring
despotism to home.
The
Philippines, expecting independence like Cuba, did not get freedom. They
had a rebellion that was crushed in 1901, and did not gain there independence
until 1946.
What’s the deal with the Panama Canal?
Under
Roosevelt, the US felt it needed faster mobility through the Americas for
economic and military reasons. The Hay-Pauncefote Treaty (1901) with
Britain gave the US the OK to build the canal.
It is also important to note that in this whole ordeal Columbia felt
left out, and this hurt US relations with South America.
I know this is long, but I hope it provides a good tool for
studying. As always, please feel free to
add or revise as you feel necessary. Here
is a question to respond to: Did the US
have good reasons to imperialize in Latin America and the Pacific, or is this
just another example of heartless exploitation?
Explain.
Great post Sam! I think in the eyes of imperialists, "heartless exploitation" is a "good" reason. The US was clearly using democratic ideals to disguise its political and economic intentions in foreign affairs. An example of this from the reading include the establishment of Reconcentration camps in the Philippines, which were similar to those of Weyler in Cuba that Americans originally fought against. America's declared reasons were much different from her true intentions.
ReplyDeleteAwesome post Sam! This is a great study tool. I'd like to add a bit about the Panama Canal. I don't think it was as much that Colombia felt left out, rather that Colombians were angered over Roosevelt's actions. You see, even though Britain had given the US the ok to build the canal through the Hay-Pauncefote Treaty, Colombia had refused to let the US buy land. A treaty was in the process of being negotiated that was favorable to the US, leasing a 6 mile wide zone for $10 million and a yearly $250,000 payment. Yet this was rejected by the senate in Bogota, for the isthmian strip was a hugely valuable natural asset to Colombia that Colombians didn't want to give up for such a low price. Despite this, Roosevelt demanded that the canal would be built without Colombia's consent, saying that it was Colombia that had wronged the US by not letting itself be benefited by the canal. This did not make the Colombians happy, and very much hurt relations between the US and Latin America.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Chelsea, for clarifying this. I was definitely a little confused on how Colombia played into this whole ordeal.
ReplyDelete