Hey all!
The other day I watched an old Disney movie, a favorite of mine titled Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron, and I was pleasantly surprised to find that many of the events in the movie corresponded to what we have been recently studying, especially the Battle of Little Bighorn. I've included a plot summary of the movie, in case you aren't familiar with it, and I hope you'll find it as cool as I did!
Movie
Plot:
Spirit is a young stallion who
leads the Cimarron herd, a herd of wild mustangs that live in the Great Plains.
One night, however, Spirit is captured by soldiers and is taken to an army
fort.
The leader of the fort, known
simply as “Colonel”, has taken an instant dislike to Spirit’s defiance, so the
Colonel orders Spirit to be tied to a post for three days with no food or
water. While he is tied, a young Lakota brave named Little Creek is brought in
and tied to a post as well. That night, Little Creek cuts himself free with a
knife and escapes with Spirit, taking him to the Lakota village.
At the Lakota's camp, after
many failed attempts at trying to ride Spirit, Little Creek finally realizes
that no one should ever ride Spirit and sets him free. Meanwhile, the Colonel
and his men attack the Lakota camp.
Little Creek runs toward the
Colonel, who levels a gun at him. Spirit rams the Colonel's horse, saving
Little Creek, before he is captured by the army again. Little Creek is amazed
that Spirit saved his life and so pursues the train Spirit is loaded on.
Spirit and other horses are
then used by the army to help build a railroad by moving steam engine up a
steep mountain. Spirit realizes that the railroad tracks are headed directly
towards his homeland and that he must escape and stop them. He succeeds, but
when a fire starts, Spirit’s harness gets caught on a branch and he is helpless
until Little Creek appears and cuts him loose. The two escape, but the next
morning they are found by the Colonel and his men. Spirit, with Little Creek on
his back, escapes, and the Colonel gives up on the chase for good.
When they return to the Lakota
village, Little Creek says goodbye to Spirit and sends him home, naming him
"Spirit-who-could-not-be-broken". Spirit travels back to his homeland
and finds his herd, and his mother, safe and sound, and lives happily ever
after.
I
watched this movie recently, and found it almost comical that we should study
the Battle of Little Bighorn right afterwards. If you couldn’t guess, the
“Colonel” is most likely a reference to Custer, but may also allude to other
generals of the time period that had similar experiences.
The
fort the Colonel resides over may be an interpretation of Fort Laramie, which
has been previously mentioned in an earlier post. Little Creek’s “battle” with
the Colonel reflects those of the Lakota people that actually occurred,
although in reality the Lakota were defeated and ended up confined in
reservations living off of government rations.
When
Spirit is recaptured by the army and forced to help build the railroad, this is
an example of the westward expansion that we have been discussing in class. I
thought it was very interesting that a movie produced in 2002 would choose such
a theme, and, even more surprisingly, that we would just happen to be studying
the events from the movie just after I watched it.
For
all you horse-lovers (or Disney fans) out there, I thought this would be a fun
post! Hope you enjoyed it!
Ashley, cool connection! It's surprising that the Colonel is portrayed as an antagonist in the 2002 Disney movie. Maybe that's a sign that people are acquiring broader, more accepting perspectives. In contrast to the Disney movie, Custer was misrepresented in the media as a hero after his last stand. For example, the drawing hung up in saloons that depicted Custer, the protagonist, bravely fighting Indians carrying Zulu shields was an extremely biased portrait of him that was insensitive towards the Indians.
ReplyDeleteWithin this post there are definitely some very impressive connections that I would never have thought of. I do vaguely remember watching this movie but even if I rewatched it now I doubt I would have made the connection to Fort Laramie and westward expansion. Since you've explained it, however, it seems very plausible. This post brings up an excellent way to explain Little Bighorn to someone familiar with this movie. The ending, though, is significantly different. I wonder if there would be a way to reason that out in an essay?
ReplyDelete